CONGRATULATIONS TO PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP, WHAT WENT WRONG FOR KAMALA HARRIS?

by Nicholas Patti

November 6, 2024, Wake Forest, NC—If anyone deserves to serve a second term as U.S. President, that person is Donald Trump. He never stopped fighting for it, facing considerable obstacles and overcoming numerous significant personal challenges. I congratulate him on his victory. He earned it, more than anyone else, after all.

That said, his victory in the electoral college, and so far, in the popular vote, as well, has left Vice President Kamala Harris supporters like myself wondering, what happened (Wolf Blitzer, CNN, 11/6/2024)? Wasn’t there supposed to be a so-called “blue wall” of three states that would tilt, reliably, toward the Democrats? Was it merely a glass ceiling among these and other voters around the country that could not support a woman in a leadership role, again (re: Hillary Clinton’s loss in 2016)? What exactly went wrong for Kamala Harris with the American electorate? I have some thoughts.

Finally, I should note that while I congratulate President-elect Donald Trump on his victory in this national presidential election, I continue to have very different politics than he does. I am a democratic socialist, locally and globally, and he is something of a nationalist. I supported Kamala Harris because she is closer to my politics, and because she had the message of looking forward to a better future in America, which is an idea that is closer to the socialist, utopian dream. That dream is for a better world, here on Earth, in the future that we make for ourselves, collectively. That dream has been attempted on Earth in recent history, but has yet to be attempted or achieved on a global scale, and never in the United States. When state socialism fails in one country or another in line with global capitalism or militarily beset against it, people write off the entire idea of socialism. I do not. I believe it is in our collective best interest to continue to strive toward that goal, locally and globally, for a better world for ourselves and for all. That includes improving the environment, and avoiding the pitfalls of over-industrialization on our climate and planet.

Kamala Harris was not a socialist. She was a liberal whose ideas were rejected in a popular vote by the American people yesterday in favor of an American, nationalist, and populist conservatism. For the next four years, we will all live with the results, here in America.

Our only consolation is that we have seen this playbook before. President-elect Trump has already served one term, and we know that he loves the job and takes it very seriously. We lived through it before; chances are we can live through it, again. We know that while he will definitely put his own imprimatur on how he does the job, he will definitely do the job of an American president, just like his successor, and now predecessor, President Joe Biden, did, as well.

First, I should say that I admire just how hard President-elect Donald Trump fought, time and again, to reach this pinnacle for himself. He achieved his political comeback from absolute pariah who lost in 2020 and rioted in response against the entire American political establishment, to victor in this 2024 national election, a victor who has now claimed the new title for himself, President-elect, in addition to only former President. President Trump fought hard, he never stopped fighting, and he won. He deserves credit.

What obstacles did former President Trump overcome on his way to this election victory? First, there were the trials. Namely, two federal trials on hold, and two state trials. The trial in New York actually happened and resulted in 34 felony convictions in New York State criminal courts for President Trump. He is awaiting sentencing. Next, there were the assassination attempts. During one rally in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump was shot. The bullet grazed his ear, but the secret service saved Trump’s life. In this instance, Donald Trump came within inches of dying from the gunshot, but he came out alright, with a small wound on his ear. This assassination attempt did not slow Donald Trump down on the campaign trail, however. He continued to hold rallies, with updated security measures from the Secret Service. Then, there was the second assassination attempt. This time, the Secret Service caught the shooter before the shooter was able to shoot at Trump, at all. Add these challenges for Trump to the usual brutal schedule of frequent rallies and two debates against two different presidential candidates during the course of a heated campaign season. Trump faced it all, and Trump triumphed.

I should note at this time that President-elect Trump did not only defeat one candidate, he defeated two. First, he vanquished President Biden in the first debate of the campaign. Biden dropped out. Enter candidate number two. Vice President Kamala Harris made it through the election, when she lost, including a second debate, for President Trump, against candidate number two. In the end, President Trump not only defeated President Biden in this campaign. President Trump defeated Biden’s entire administration, including President Biden, himself, and Biden’s Vice President, Kamala Harris.

Meeting all of these challenges and winning at the ballot box in the final, national vote is the scale of President-elect Trump’s victory in this election. He came, he saw, he conquered. Now, he wins his second term. That is how much Donald Trump wanted this, and that is what Donald Trump receives—his second term as US president.

TrumpGoogleImage
President-elect Donald Trump

That is all the better for President-elect Donald Trump. What about Vice President Kamala Harris, however, Americans’ last and best hope for progress from the top? She lost. Her supporters, like me, are left wondering, what went wrong?

The first thing that comes to mind is the so-called blue wall. She lost all three states, namely, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. They went red, i.e., Republican, every one of them. Those three states were supposed to represent the Democratic Party’s working class support, and would provide the easiest pathway for candidate Kamala Harris to win 270 electoral votes and win the Presidency. Not so. Every last one eventually fell for candidate Donald Trump. Trump turned the so-called blue wall into what could best be described as a purple door. Trump won all three in 2016, then President Biden won all three in 2020, and now Donald Trump has won all three, again, in 2024. They can no longer be described as a blue wall, in my opinion. They have voted for President Trump in two out of three elections since 2016, including this one. I would describe them, instead, as a purple door. They swing this way or that, like a door, in a purple fashion, politically speaking, from election to election.

Of course, there is more going on here than only that. The fact is that real wages have not kept up with inflation during the years under President Biden, according to CNN, 11/5/2024. Biden failed to deliver for the workers of the Blue Wall states, and the economy, high costs, and inflation became a key issue driving voters to the polls for President Trump. If the Blue Wall working class voters failed to deliver for the Democrats, it was because the Democrats failed to deliver for them. They fell for Donald Trump and the Republican Party’s message.

In defense of President Joe Biden’s economic policies, briefly, I will only note that President Biden has helped deliver for Americans in general the best economy in the world, at this time. What that means is that Biden delivered on jobs for the American worker. With all of the money flowing around the economy, as a result, and in addition to massive public spending to stimulate the economy, the economy picked up. As a result, prices and costs increased substantially for the individual American worker and consumer. Gas prices, groceries, and housing costs all skyrocketed. This situation did not produce gratitude for having money and a job; instead, it caused significant discontent. Americans in general, and blue wall American workers, voiced their discontent at the ballot box.

There is another dynamic going on here, however, that I would like to note. This dynamic I would term as the glass ceiling. In 2016, Hillary Clinton lost the blue wall to Trump. People blamed Hillary Clinton. She neglected campaigning there, and she took their support for granted. The fact is, they voted for the man, Donald Trump.

Nobody thought too much about that, however, after President Joe Biden won back the blue wall states in 2020. Then came this election, in 2024. Again, the Democratic Party candidate was a woman. Again, the blue wall voters fell in line for President Trump, not the woman Democrat, Kamala Harris. No one could accuse Kamala Harris of neglecting these voters, nor taking them for granted. Both the Harris and the Trump campaigns spent incredible amounts of time and money campaigning intensively across the traditional Blue Wall states. Nonetheless, the Blue Wall voters fell for Trump, not Harris. It seems that the support from the Blue Wall state voters can be counted on for male candidates, namely, Joe Biden, but not for the women candidates, namely, Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.

In light of this, the Blue Wall, working class male voters cannot be accused of being feminists. They can be accused of not delivering their support for a woman candidate, however, in contrast to actually supporting a male candidate. It seems that if a woman candidate takes the primary leadership role, she loses support among the Blue Wall. The glass ceiling, in these cases, seems to end at the Vice President’s office. Above that, forget it. There, the woman candidate will discover a glass ceiling, and not receive the same support that a man does receive. In this case, in 2024, these voters broke for the man in the race, Donald Trump.

Both of these trends help explain the victory of Donald Trump over Kamala Harris, but there is yet another dynamic at play here, so far as I can see. While I may be a socialist voter in America, voting Democratic, the general voters in America, including but not exclusively the Blue Wall voters, are more anarchists than socialists. What do I mean? Vote the bums out, in other words. Since 2016, there is a strong ani-incumbent tendency to the American electorate, writ large. First, the Obamas were surprised that American voters favored a major change in direction when the voters chose the right-wing alternative of Donald Trump in 2016. Next, after one term of Donald Trump, the American voters were sick of him, and elected the challenger, Joe Biden, for many reasons. President Biden promised a dramatic change from the atmosphere and direction of President Trump. Voters chose President Biden.

Now, voters expressed discontent at President Biden, also after one term. They chose the alternative. Donald Trump promised a radical change of direction from President Biden, and papered over his own record as a rosy past for Americans, including jobs and lower costs. Voters chose President Trump, the alternative.

Enter Vice President Kamala Harris. She tried to portray herself as an alternative to both President Biden and President Trump, calling a vote for her a vote for “a new way forward.” She campaigned on a break from the politics of the past. Ultimately, Trump tied her, successfully, to President Biden’s current term, pointing out that she currently served as the Vice President. One campaign ad comes to mind in which Vice President Harris said she could not think of one thing she would do differently from President Biden in her next four years. That ad resonated with voters. They chose to vote against her as part of the incumbent administration of President Biden.

American voters have been voting the bums out since the election of 2016. With limited choices, they continue to vote in this pattern, today. This shows a more anarchist approach to leadership in the United States, notsomuch a socialist vision. I am not seriously arguing that American voters are a bunch of anarchists, which some people, by the way, would take as a complement. No, I am merely saying that American voters are voting, in the last three presidential elections, as if they were anarchists, happily, or angrily, voting in US presidential elections.

This anti-incumbent fervor must be noted among voters in this and recent US presidential elections. In any case, now we are left with President-elect Donald J. Trump. Again. May we all survive his second term. Donald Trump fought hard for this second term, and Donald J. Trump achieved it. Good for him. Now, if we all can just survive a second term of his right-wing, national populism, again, I should note, then we will be all the better for it. I do not think the American government is at risk of falling, now, however. Instead, I think the American government continues, from the last ten to twenty years, and ongoing from here. May we all learn to fight for a better future the way Donald Trump fought for his second term. There is still hope on our horizon, despite the chaos of this election and our recent shared history.

—Nicholas Patti

Wake Forest, NC

USA

Harris_606bb0_copy
Vice President Kamala Harris

Additional Sources: 

CNN, 11/6/2024, 11/5/2024.

WRAL news, WRAL, Raleigh, NC, 11/5/2024, 11/6/2024, NBC, television news and alerts.

ABC news, 11/5/2024, 11/6/2024, television news.

News and Observer, Raleigh, NC: 11/6/2024, digital news.

 

VOTE! Up and Down the Ticket in North Carolina, United States

by Nicholas Patti

The United States of America is a democracy, and one thing that means is that we, the American people, have the chance to vote for our president. In North Carolina, this year is also an election year for our governor. Use it or lose it! My first shout-out on this blog is to urge everyone in North Carolina, and in fact, throughout the United States, to vote. We must exercise our right to vote, if we wish to maintain our country as a democracy. As to whom to vote for, each of us makes up our own mind about each candidate, taking into account policy stances, political party, and yes, the values and character of each candidate. Consider this post my endorsement post on this blog for these two offices, in particular: the president of the United States, and the governor of the State of North Carolina. The important thing is, however, that each person who is a citizen of this country takes up his or her responsibility and duty as a citizen, and votes.

Let us begin with the American president. I would like to add my voice to those Democratic Party convention delegates this year who chanted, “Thank you, Joe!” to current President Joe Biden when he took the stage and addressed the Democratic Party convention this year. I think President Joe Biden has done a bang-up job as an American president during his term, and I thank him for his almost four years of public service as our president, and for his decades of service in American government as vice-president and U.S. senator, before that. He has had a long and terrific career as an elected official serving the American public in Washington.

Having said that, I think it was wise for him to step aside as the Democratic Party candidate for president in this election for the next term. In his speech at the convention this year, President Biden said he was putting country before personal ambition. He argued that we must keep former President Donald Trump out of the executive office, utilizing the ballot box, at all costs. I disagree, humbly. I think President Biden was not placing country before personal ambition, but rather, placing political party before personal ambition. It is true the election looked lost for President Biden when our President made the decision to pull out as a candidate. What President Biden did was to hand-select an alternate candidate whom our current President believed could beat Donald Trump at the ballot box, and make her the Democratic Party candidate. This move would be the Democrats’ best shot at holding the White House in Democratic Party hands. Thus, after ignoring many calls to do so, President Joe Biden handed over the baton to the next generation of leadership in the Democratic Party, and likely, in our country. I follow President Joe Biden’s lead in choosing our current U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as my preferred candidate for our next American president.

As a much younger candidate than either President Biden or former President Donald Trump, Kamala Harris would represent handing leadership of our country over to the next generation of leadership, if elected. Her selection by the Democrats represented a political disaster for President Trump and the Republicans, at the time, since she was much younger than either of the two previous candidates, Biden and Trump. The Republican Party attack ads and attack lines at the first debate between Biden and Trump, that President Biden was too old and infirm to govern, now fell entirely flat. In fact, these attacks would tarnish President Trump himself, moreso than anyone else, now that he was the only older white guy in the race, and Democratic Party candidate Kamala Harris could paint herself as the clear alternative for the future.

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris introduced herself, described who she is, and outlined what her priorities would be, if elected president, in the Democratic Convention this year. Although she remains politically liberal, she did an end-run to the political center, and reassured all that she would uphold America’s position in the world, militarily, economically, politically, and in concert with traditional U.S. allies across the world. In addition, she promised to cut costs for the American consumer and to fight for the American working and middle class. She contrasted her position with former President Donald Trump, who she claimed would fight only for himself and for billionaires. Whether that is true or not, or only a Democratic Party attack line against the Republican nominee for president, I leave to each individual voter to decide. 

What I do know is that after this election for U.S. president, either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump will be our next president. For better or worse, the American people will live with either one for the next four years. We are lucky that we, the American people, have the right to vote and choose which one will be our next president. I plan to vote for Kamala Harris. Either way, I urge every American citizen to make the choice and vote.

Vice President Kamala Harris, Democratic Party nominee for President
Vert_WIN_20240822_13_45_10_Pro

My Poetry Book

Enjoy this eclectic, often comic collection of poems by me. One poem, “News Junkie,” covers former President Trump’s first term, pre-pandemic. Price includes taxes and shipping & handling.

$15.00

Let me turn my focus from the race for US president to the race for governor of the State of North Carolina. Before I make my endorsement, let me review who the candidates are, from the Democratic and Republican parties, for the office. When voting for governor of North Carolina, North Carolinian voters may choose from the Democratic candidate, Josh Stein, current North Carolina Attorney General, and the Republican candidate, Mark Robinson, current North Carolina Lieutenant Governor. Both candidates claim to be for the working, sometimes struggling, families of North Carolina. Who is the best choice?

Josh Stein is a reliable Democrat, promising to bring Democratic policies to the state, and continuing on the legacy that the popular current governor, Democrat Roy Cooper, is leaving to the state. Democrat Roy Cooper has brought, for example, medicaid expansion to the North Carolina, which Governor Cooper and the Democrats of North Carolina fought for roughly 10 years to enact as law in North Carolina. Josh Stein would continue that legacy of having a Democrat in the Governor’s mansion. 

On crime, Republicans have attacked Josh Stein as soft on crime, largely because he is a Democrat. Fighting crime is a hot-button issue for Republicans. However, Josh Stein has countered that, as the current state Attorney General, he has been fighting crime in North Carolina for years. No one accuses the Republican of being soft on crime.

The issue of choice, or abortion, separates the two candidates. Josh Stein is pro-choice, similar to the current Governor, Roy Cooper. Mark Robinson is pro-life. Robinson has waffled on the extent of his pro-life views, flipping between supporting the current anti-abortion law on the books in North Carolina, and calling for an even more stringent anti-abortion law. The current law bans abortions in North Carolina, with notable exceptions, but the question is six or twelve weeks into the pregnancy, when abortion would become illegal in North Carolina. Six weeks would be sooner than the current law in North Carolina, and Robinson has said he would support a six-week ban. He has qualified his position, however, by saying that the legislature has already enacted the current law, and the power to change the law to restrict abortion even further is not up to him, but the state legislature.

I am pro-choice and I support Democratic candidate Josh Stein on this issue.

Then, there is the question of character and background. The latest news, which made the national news, is a sex scandal concerning the Republican candidate, Mark Robinson. According to CNN, Robinson went on a porn website ten years ago, before he was in politics, and made disconcerting comments. He called himself a “black Nazi,” and endorsed slavery, saying he would buy a few slaves. When interviewed about this scandal by CNN after the report was aired, Robinson denied the whole affair. Robinson called it a lynching of him, using AI, the internet, and cable news. It looks to me that CNN did not make the story up, however, and that the story is true.

The next response Robinson had to this scandal was to state that he is remaining in the race, that he is not dropping out because of this one incident, the truth of which he denies. I agree that he should stay in the race and let the voters of North Carolina decide if this one example of essentially sexual misconduct via an on-line porn site disqualifies him from the highest executive office in North Carolina, or not.

Later, just today, September 20, 2024, on CNN, former North Carolina Governor, Republican Pat McCrory, threw Robinson under the bus. Former Governor Pat McCrory said that Mark Robinson is unfit to be governor. McCrory thought that the Republican Party of North Carolina should do a better job vetting their candidate for governor. McCrory said that for Lieutenant Governor, the job Robinson currently holds, that he would be an ok candidate. Not for governor, McCrory said. McCrory’s opinion is that Robinson has said and done things in the past that should preclude him from holding the highest office in the state. McCrory thinks the governor candidate should be vetted more than for the Lieutenant Governor, since the Governor’s office is more high-profile. McCrory said that the press will look into the full background of the candidate moreso for the governor’s office than the lieutenant governor’s. McCrory said he was vetted by the Republican Party in North Carolina before he became the candidate, and ultimately, the Governor of North Carolina. He continued, that the Republican Party of North Carolina knew these things about Robinson’s questionable background, but chose him anyway. The reason that McCrory gave that the Republican Party of North Carolina chose Robinson for the candidacy is that Robinson is a very good public speaker. McCrory said Robinson is very populist and gives such good speeches, he became very popular. For McCrory, however, it was not just this latest scandal that disqualified Robinson. McCrory said that there are numerous things about Robinson’s background that calls into question his character and fitness for the highest office of the state. McCrory admitted it is too late under North Carolina election law to switch candidates, so the question is academic.

One thing that former Governor Pat McCrory did say was that North Carolina is a purple state. Voters often split their tickets in North Carolina. He said that any questions about Robinson’s influence on the top of the ticket, the U.S. president, cannot be easily discerned. Robinson could bring down other Republicans up and down the ticket, or voters in North Carolina could split their tickets. The implication is that even if voters reject Robinson, they could still vote for Republican Donald Trump for U.S. president.

I think the question of character is relevant for the office of governor. Democrat Josh Stein is a Jew, he is liberal to moderate, and he is the current Attorney General. Can you imagine that Josh Stein’s opponent, Mark Robinson, called himself a Nazi once, who would want to own a slave? Josh Stein is Jewish. The holocaust must be remembered, regarding Nazis, slavery, and Jews. Mark Robinson’s comments are abhorrent.

In defense of Mark Robinson, however, he was using the services of a porn website. These traffic in sexual fantasies with the goal of sexual pleasure for the user. There is another concept at work here. That is the concept of mental slavery. The idea here is that actual slavery has been abolished, but mental slavery persists. It seems that in this on-line porn posting, Mark Robinson was engaging in mental slavery, as the owner, of course, for his own sexual pleasure. Let me note that praying in the Protestant Christian faith frees one from mental slavery, especially in the United States. Robinson has been shown in videos preaching from the pulpit of a black Protestant Church. Suffice it to say, Mark Robinson has been saved, in a Protestant Christian point of view, since that on-line posting. Robinson today disavows that earlier statement he made, on the porn website, some years ago. Would Robinson as governor promote mental slavery or fight to abolish mental slavery? The comment on the porn website sheds doubt on that question, but he disavows that he ever even made that remark. His Protestant Christian faith, which he proudly embraces, suggests Robinson would be squarely on the side of emancipation from mental slavery, to paraphrase the reggae singer, Bob Marley. It seems to me, however, that in that comment Robinson made on the porn website years ago, Robinson was still caught, as a “bad boy,” smack dab in the middle of the mindset of mental slavery. Of course, it should be noted, in the comment on the porn website, Robinson was not a mental slave, he was an owner. The point is to abolish the mindset of mental slavery, entirely.

People derive their sexual pleasure however they derive their sexual pleasure. I am not one to judge on that basis. My only question is, can we trust someone who might be struggling with the concept of mental slavery to be our governor? Is he going to try to make a prisoner, for example, of the State of North Carolina, a mental slave? This is an important question, I think. I think we might take the opportunity to discuss mental slavery, at this point, rather than simply treating this as a sex scandal and demonstrating unfitness for higher office.

I would like to see a reporter ask Mark Robinson if he has heard of mental slavery, and what he thinks about it? Given that he once endorsed it in writing, I think that is a legitimate question.

Both candidates for North Carolina can be asked this question. For example, as NC Attorney General, would Josh Stein allow any correction officer in North Carolina to make any prisoner believe that they were a slave, and I do mean, while incarcerated? This could potentially be used to control the prisoner. It is my sincere hope that, in addition to fighting crime, that the rights of prisoners while incarcerated should be upheld. No one should be made to feel that they are enslaved, even if they were currently imprisoned. I would like to hear both candidates comment on this one example, and on mental slavery, in general.

In any case, Josh Stein has not endorsed slavery in writing. Mark Robinson has. However, Mark Robinson is himself a black man in America, in North Carolina, in particular. Although Mark Robinson was having a sexual fantasy, at the time, as an owner, on a porn website, I think the question is still relevant. It is even more relevant as Robinson is running for the highest executive office in our state.

Anyway, that is what former Governor Pat McCrory is talking about.  Character. Myself, I do not think one wild sexual fantasy on a porn website ten years ago necessarily disqualifies one from holding higher office. Pat McCrory is correct about the media and the opposition in politics digging up the dirt on any questionable, certainly scandalous, activity and positions from the past. Ultimately, it is up to the voters of North Carolina to decide.

If it is not clear already, let me make my endorsement for the office of Governor of North Carolina clear. I plan to vote for the Democrat, Josh Stein. I base my endorsement both on policy and personality issues.

I urge all North Carolinians to vote, however, for either candidate, or for independents, for both Governor and President of the United States. I urge all Americans to vote in this year’s presidential election, also.

NC Attorney General Josh Stein, Democratic candidate for Governor
Mark Robinson, Lieutenant Governor of NC, Republican candidate for Governor

—Nicholas Patti

Wake Forest, NC

September 20, 2024

Sources:

News and Observer, Raleigh, NC, multiple articles, 2024.

CNN, 9/20/2024, 9/19/2024, television news.

WRAL news, NBC affiliate, Raleigh, NC, television news.

ABC news, shown over local ABC affiliate, Raleigh, NC, television news.

Photos: all photos complements of respective campaign websites.