VOTE! Up and Down the Ticket in North Carolina, United States

by Nicholas Patti

The United States of America is a democracy, and one thing that means is that we, the American people, have the chance to vote for our president. In North Carolina, this year is also an election year for our governor. Use it or lose it! My first shout-out on this blog is to urge everyone in North Carolina, and in fact, throughout the United States, to vote. We must exercise our right to vote, if we wish to maintain our country as a democracy. As to whom to vote for, each of us makes up our own mind about each candidate, taking into account policy stances, political party, and yes, the values and character of each candidate. Consider this post my endorsement post on this blog for these two offices, in particular: the president of the United States, and the governor of the State of North Carolina. The important thing is, however, that each person who is a citizen of this country takes up his or her responsibility and duty as a citizen, and votes.

Let us begin with the American president. I would like to add my voice to those Democratic Party convention delegates this year who chanted, “Thank you, Joe!” to current President Joe Biden when he took the stage and addressed the Democratic Party convention this year. I think President Joe Biden has done a bang-up job as an American president during his term, and I thank him for his almost four years of public service as our president, and for his decades of service in American government as vice-president and U.S. senator, before that. He has had a long and terrific career as an elected official serving the American public in Washington.

Having said that, I think it was wise for him to step aside as the Democratic Party candidate for president in this election for the next term. In his speech at the convention this year, President Biden said he was putting country before personal ambition. He argued that we must keep former President Donald Trump out of the executive office, utilizing the ballot box, at all costs. I disagree, humbly. I think President Biden was not placing country before personal ambition, but rather, placing political party before personal ambition. It is true the election looked lost for President Biden when our President made the decision to pull out as a candidate. What President Biden did was to hand-select an alternate candidate whom our current President believed could beat Donald Trump at the ballot box, and make her the Democratic Party candidate. This move would be the Democrats’ best shot at holding the White House in Democratic Party hands. Thus, after ignoring many calls to do so, President Joe Biden handed over the baton to the next generation of leadership in the Democratic Party, and likely, in our country. I follow President Joe Biden’s lead in choosing our current U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as my preferred candidate for our next American president.

As a much younger candidate than either President Biden or former President Donald Trump, Kamala Harris would represent handing leadership of our country over to the next generation of leadership, if elected. Her selection by the Democrats represented a political disaster for President Trump and the Republicans, at the time, since she was much younger than either of the two previous candidates, Biden and Trump. The Republican Party attack ads and attack lines at the first debate between Biden and Trump, that President Biden was too old and infirm to govern, now fell entirely flat. In fact, these attacks would tarnish President Trump himself, moreso than anyone else, now that he was the only older white guy in the race, and Democratic Party candidate Kamala Harris could paint herself as the clear alternative for the future.

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris introduced herself, described who she is, and outlined what her priorities would be, if elected president, in the Democratic Convention this year. Although she remains politically liberal, she did an end-run to the political center, and reassured all that she would uphold America’s position in the world, militarily, economically, politically, and in concert with traditional U.S. allies across the world. In addition, she promised to cut costs for the American consumer and to fight for the American working and middle class. She contrasted her position with former President Donald Trump, who she claimed would fight only for himself and for billionaires. Whether that is true or not, or only a Democratic Party attack line against the Republican nominee for president, I leave to each individual voter to decide. 

What I do know is that after this election for U.S. president, either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump will be our next president. For better or worse, the American people will live with either one for the next four years. We are lucky that we, the American people, have the right to vote and choose which one will be our next president. I plan to vote for Kamala Harris. Either way, I urge every American citizen to make the choice and vote.

Vice President Kamala Harris, Democratic Party nominee for President
Vert_WIN_20240822_13_45_10_Pro

My Poetry Book

Enjoy this eclectic, often comic collection of poems by me. One poem, “News Junkie,” covers former President Trump’s first term, pre-pandemic. Price includes taxes and shipping & handling.

$15.00

Let me turn my focus from the race for US president to the race for governor of the State of North Carolina. Before I make my endorsement, let me review who the candidates are, from the Democratic and Republican parties, for the office. When voting for governor of North Carolina, North Carolinian voters may choose from the Democratic candidate, Josh Stein, current North Carolina Attorney General, and the Republican candidate, Mark Robinson, current North Carolina Lieutenant Governor. Both candidates claim to be for the working, sometimes struggling, families of North Carolina. Who is the best choice?

Josh Stein is a reliable Democrat, promising to bring Democratic policies to the state, and continuing on the legacy that the popular current governor, Democrat Roy Cooper, is leaving to the state. Democrat Roy Cooper has brought, for example, medicaid expansion to the North Carolina, which Governor Cooper and the Democrats of North Carolina fought for roughly 10 years to enact as law in North Carolina. Josh Stein would continue that legacy of having a Democrat in the Governor’s mansion. 

On crime, Republicans have attacked Josh Stein as soft on crime, largely because he is a Democrat. Fighting crime is a hot-button issue for Republicans. However, Josh Stein has countered that, as the current state Attorney General, he has been fighting crime in North Carolina for years. No one accuses the Republican of being soft on crime.

The issue of choice, or abortion, separates the two candidates. Josh Stein is pro-choice, similar to the current Governor, Roy Cooper. Mark Robinson is pro-life. Robinson has waffled on the extent of his pro-life views, flipping between supporting the current anti-abortion law on the books in North Carolina, and calling for an even more stringent anti-abortion law. The current law bans abortions in North Carolina, with notable exceptions, but the question is six or twelve weeks into the pregnancy, when abortion would become illegal in North Carolina. Six weeks would be sooner than the current law in North Carolina, and Robinson has said he would support a six-week ban. He has qualified his position, however, by saying that the legislature has already enacted the current law, and the power to change the law to restrict abortion even further is not up to him, but the state legislature.

I am pro-choice and I support Democratic candidate Josh Stein on this issue.

Then, there is the question of character and background. The latest news, which made the national news, is a sex scandal concerning the Republican candidate, Mark Robinson. According to CNN, Robinson went on a porn website ten years ago, before he was in politics, and made disconcerting comments. He called himself a “black Nazi,” and endorsed slavery, saying he would buy a few slaves. When interviewed about this scandal by CNN after the report was aired, Robinson denied the whole affair. Robinson called it a lynching of him, using AI, the internet, and cable news. It looks to me that CNN did not make the story up, however, and that the story is true.

The next response Robinson had to this scandal was to state that he is remaining in the race, that he is not dropping out because of this one incident, the truth of which he denies. I agree that he should stay in the race and let the voters of North Carolina decide if this one example of essentially sexual misconduct via an on-line porn site disqualifies him from the highest executive office in North Carolina, or not.

Later, just today, September 20, 2024, on CNN, former North Carolina Governor, Republican Pat McCrory, threw Robinson under the bus. Former Governor Pat McCrory said that Mark Robinson is unfit to be governor. McCrory thought that the Republican Party of North Carolina should do a better job vetting their candidate for governor. McCrory said that for Lieutenant Governor, the job Robinson currently holds, that he would be an ok candidate. Not for governor, McCrory said. McCrory’s opinion is that Robinson has said and done things in the past that should preclude him from holding the highest office in the state. McCrory thinks the governor candidate should be vetted more than for the Lieutenant Governor, since the Governor’s office is more high-profile. McCrory said that the press will look into the full background of the candidate moreso for the governor’s office than the lieutenant governor’s. McCrory said he was vetted by the Republican Party in North Carolina before he became the candidate, and ultimately, the Governor of North Carolina. He continued, that the Republican Party of North Carolina knew these things about Robinson’s questionable background, but chose him anyway. The reason that McCrory gave that the Republican Party of North Carolina chose Robinson for the candidacy is that Robinson is a very good public speaker. McCrory said Robinson is very populist and gives such good speeches, he became very popular. For McCrory, however, it was not just this latest scandal that disqualified Robinson. McCrory said that there are numerous things about Robinson’s background that calls into question his character and fitness for the highest office of the state. McCrory admitted it is too late under North Carolina election law to switch candidates, so the question is academic.

One thing that former Governor Pat McCrory did say was that North Carolina is a purple state. Voters often split their tickets in North Carolina. He said that any questions about Robinson’s influence on the top of the ticket, the U.S. president, cannot be easily discerned. Robinson could bring down other Republicans up and down the ticket, or voters in North Carolina could split their tickets. The implication is that even if voters reject Robinson, they could still vote for Republican Donald Trump for U.S. president.

I think the question of character is relevant for the office of governor. Democrat Josh Stein is a Jew, he is liberal to moderate, and he is the current Attorney General. Can you imagine that Josh Stein’s opponent, Mark Robinson, called himself a Nazi once, who would want to own a slave? Josh Stein is Jewish. The holocaust must be remembered, regarding Nazis, slavery, and Jews. Mark Robinson’s comments are abhorrent.

In defense of Mark Robinson, however, he was using the services of a porn website. These traffic in sexual fantasies with the goal of sexual pleasure for the user. There is another concept at work here. That is the concept of mental slavery. The idea here is that actual slavery has been abolished, but mental slavery persists. It seems that in this on-line porn posting, Mark Robinson was engaging in mental slavery, as the owner, of course, for his own sexual pleasure. Let me note that praying in the Protestant Christian faith frees one from mental slavery, especially in the United States. Robinson has been shown in videos preaching from the pulpit of a black Protestant Church. Suffice it to say, Mark Robinson has been saved, in a Protestant Christian point of view, since that on-line posting. Robinson today disavows that earlier statement he made, on the porn website, some years ago. Would Robinson as governor promote mental slavery or fight to abolish mental slavery? The comment on the porn website sheds doubt on that question, but he disavows that he ever even made that remark. His Protestant Christian faith, which he proudly embraces, suggests Robinson would be squarely on the side of emancipation from mental slavery, to paraphrase the reggae singer, Bob Marley. It seems to me, however, that in that comment Robinson made on the porn website years ago, Robinson was still caught, as a “bad boy,” smack dab in the middle of the mindset of mental slavery. Of course, it should be noted, in the comment on the porn website, Robinson was not a mental slave, he was an owner. The point is to abolish the mindset of mental slavery, entirely.

People derive their sexual pleasure however they derive their sexual pleasure. I am not one to judge on that basis. My only question is, can we trust someone who might be struggling with the concept of mental slavery to be our governor? Is he going to try to make a prisoner, for example, of the State of North Carolina, a mental slave? This is an important question, I think. I think we might take the opportunity to discuss mental slavery, at this point, rather than simply treating this as a sex scandal and demonstrating unfitness for higher office.

I would like to see a reporter ask Mark Robinson if he has heard of mental slavery, and what he thinks about it? Given that he once endorsed it in writing, I think that is a legitimate question.

Both candidates for North Carolina can be asked this question. For example, as NC Attorney General, would Josh Stein allow any correction officer in North Carolina to make any prisoner believe that they were a slave, and I do mean, while incarcerated? This could potentially be used to control the prisoner. It is my sincere hope that, in addition to fighting crime, that the rights of prisoners while incarcerated should be upheld. No one should be made to feel that they are enslaved, even if they were currently imprisoned. I would like to hear both candidates comment on this one example, and on mental slavery, in general.

In any case, Josh Stein has not endorsed slavery in writing. Mark Robinson has. However, Mark Robinson is himself a black man in America, in North Carolina, in particular. Although Mark Robinson was having a sexual fantasy, at the time, as an owner, on a porn website, I think the question is still relevant. It is even more relevant as Robinson is running for the highest executive office in our state.

Anyway, that is what former Governor Pat McCrory is talking about.  Character. Myself, I do not think one wild sexual fantasy on a porn website ten years ago necessarily disqualifies one from holding higher office. Pat McCrory is correct about the media and the opposition in politics digging up the dirt on any questionable, certainly scandalous, activity and positions from the past. Ultimately, it is up to the voters of North Carolina to decide.

If it is not clear already, let me make my endorsement for the office of Governor of North Carolina clear. I plan to vote for the Democrat, Josh Stein. I base my endorsement both on policy and personality issues.

I urge all North Carolinians to vote, however, for either candidate, or for independents, for both Governor and President of the United States. I urge all Americans to vote in this year’s presidential election, also.

NC Attorney General Josh Stein, Democratic candidate for Governor
Mark Robinson, Lieutenant Governor of NC, Republican candidate for Governor

—Nicholas Patti

Wake Forest, NC

September 20, 2024

Sources:

News and Observer, Raleigh, NC, multiple articles, 2024.

CNN, 9/20/2024, 9/19/2024, television news.

WRAL news, NBC affiliate, Raleigh, NC, television news.

ABC news, shown over local ABC affiliate, Raleigh, NC, television news.

Photos: all photos complements of respective campaign websites.

Trump Guilty Verdict Tarnishes Image: Stay Outta Jail

by Nicholas Patti

June 1, 2024, Raleigh, NC—The following classic rock song lyric tells the story of Donald Trump’s hush money trial guilty verdict while running for president as the presumptive Republican party candidate:

…The jig is up, the news is out,

They finally found me.

The renegade

Who had it made

Retrieved for a bounty,

 

Nevermore to go astray,

The judge will have revenge today,

On a wanted man.

—“Renegade,” Styx, 1978

In which song lyric, former President Donald Trump stars as the renegade, Judge Juan M. Merchan stars as the judge, and Trump’s sentencing date of July 11 is the day the judge will have his revenge on Donald Trump, the wanted man.

This narrative is exactly the one coming out of the Trump campaign and Trump himself in his speeches at this time. President Trump is wanted for challenging President Biden for the high office, and all of President Trump’s personal legal problems, including this conviction by a jury in Manhattan on felony charges, are the result of a political witch-hunt personally directed by current President Joe Biden from the White House in Washington.

We should note a very basic, critical reading of the song text, literary critic-style, as it applies to former President Donald Trump, as well. Note that in the song, the “renegade,” aka Donald Trump, is the hero, the protagonist. The judge, representing law-and-order, is the antagonist, the anti-hero, or the villain. President Trump certainly portrays the real-life judge, Judge Juan Merchan, as the villain, or anti-hero, as well. In accusing current President Biden of targeting Trump, politically, with the legal system in this case, as in all others, President Trump casts current President Biden as a starring anti-hero, or villain, as well. In this way, former President Trump flips the script on current President Biden. President Trump, the now-convicted felon, becomes the hero, the good guy, while his opponent, current President Biden, becomes the anti-hero, or villain. Thus, although convicted, himself, of hiding a hush money payment to a porn star actress for political gain in a former presidential election, President Trump accuses President Biden and our country’s legal system of corruption.

Oh well. My only advice to former President Trump at this time is to listen to the old adage: “the road to ruin is paved with good intentions.” In this case, former President Trump’s good intention is to return to the White House via the presidential election this November. The road to ruin for President Trump would be to anger the judge at sentencing that leads former President Trump to see the inside of a jail cell for whatever term, instead of, or in addition to, winning back the White House. Former President Trump may think twice of playing the victim in this case from a vengeful jury and judge to the extent that former President Trump makes a convincing case to the judge, come his sentencing hearing on July 11, for the judge to throw the book at him, landing former President Trump in jail, wholly unnecessarily so.

TrumpGoogleImage
Former President Donald Trump

I, for one, hope President Trump avoids any jail time on these 34 felony counts that he was just convicted of. What, in essence, is Donald Trump convicted of? Essentially, he is convicted of being a wealthy man and celebrity, himself, who allegedly slept with a porn star actress, Stormy Daniels, in 2006, and maybe a Playboy Playmate or two, Karen McDougal, and then paying one of these sex models hush money, in this case Stormy Daniels, and then concealing the payment to make himself look good in the middle of a presidential election, 2016, which he subsequently won (“Guilty,” News & Observer, Raleigh, NC, digital edition, 5/31/2024). I say, big deal. So what?

I agree with President Trump, in one of his courtside chats, as seen live over the past few weeks during the trial, viewed on CNN this May, in which he said, “I did nothing wrong” (approximate quote). Personally, I do not feel that sleeping with a Playboy Playmate, or a young porn star actress, is terribly wrong. The most you should get for that is a starring role on “Ain’t Misbehavin’” (fictional). In fact, President Trump had a day on “Access Hollywood,” years ago, I believe it was said, and more recently, currently, he had a starring role on various 24-hour cable news channels in Stormy Daniels testimony in this trial as to his participation in their mutual sex scene (which President Trump still wholly denies ever happened) (“Guilty,” News & Observer, Raleigh, NC, digital edition, 5/31/2024; CNN; Fox News). This time, the courtroom testimony was not directly televised, either. This, simply, is not criminal.

At another point in one of his courtside chats during this trial, President Trump pondered, “Mother Teresa could not beat these charges” (approximate quote). President Trump is not claiming to be Mother Teresa in this scenario. He is claiming to be a regular American man with a sex drive who was running for president. We do not require our presidents in this country to be Mother Teresa, witness President Bill Clinton in the 1990s, also, and his White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. President Clinton remained in office. Are these presidents acting in an immoral manner? Grow up! We do not require our Presidents to be Mother Teresa—oh wait, in President Trump’s case, now, in this case in Manhattan, maybe we do. President Trump was convicted of his misconduct, after all.

What else did President Trump do, as charged in this case? He falsified business records to make himself look good to the electorate, thus practicing fraud on the voting population in 2016. Please. I remember that election. The Stormy Daniels case was all over the news at the time. Then, it disappeared. Everyone in America already knew who Donald Trump was. This came as no surprise to anyone. The fact that the story did not explode any worse than it did, that candidate Trump, at the time, did, in fact, contain the damage, is simply not criminal.

“I paid legal fees to a lawyer. Michael Cohen was my lawyer,” President Trump said (approximate quote), in another instance of courtside chat during this trial (viewed on CNN). That is, in fact, true. I think it is garbage that Trump needed to note that it was a hush money repayment to this lawyer. I do not think he is required to go into that level of detail into what the payment to his lawyer was for. The fact is that Michael Cohen fronted the money for the payment, then President Trump reimbursed Michael Cohen. It was, in fact, a payment from Trump to his lawyer. The point of the prosecution is what the payment was for: a re-imbursement of a hush money payment, not a “legal service.” Michael Cohen was Donald Trump’s attorney acting as a fixer, and as such, was paid by Donald Trump for his service, including and specifically, the hush money payment. I do not think President Trump should have been required to specify what Michael Cohen was doing with the money President Trump paid him: the fact is he paid him, his lawyer and fixer, the money, and noted it as such.

This act influenced the election. One, the hush money payment itself is not illegal. The concealment in the business records is the crime Trump is accused and convicted of committing, in concert with Trump’s effort to influence, i.e., “defraud,” the electorate. I am not concerned with the way Trump noted his payment to Michael Cohen in his business record, as I pointed out in the prior paragraph.

Also, I am not concerned that President Trump attempted to look good to the electorate in the middle of a presidential election (2016). I think Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche, said as much. It is the job of a candidate to try to look good, to present his best face forward, to the electorate in an election for higher office. You would expect the same of any presidential candidate.

I have addressed all aspects of the crime President Trump was convicted of. President Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsification of records. I do not think President Trump should have been convicted. The Wall Street Journal editorial board points out that the statute of limitations for the misdemeanor charge of falsification of records had already expired before this trial (5/31/2024, p. A14). Only when combining the falsification with the intent to influence the 2016 election do these charges rise to the level of a felony, and can be prosecuted at this time. For this, a jury of twelve good New Yorkers found former President Donald J. Trump guilty on all counts.

Great. What is essentially non-criminal activity is elevated to the level of a felony, on 34 counts. I find this quite ridiculous, actually. Nonetheless, I respect the courts of New York State and New York City. President Trump has the right to appeal. The felony conviction is now a legal fact for President Trump, as any conviction is a fact for any criminal defendant, upon conviction.

The good thing is that both campaigns, President Biden’s and President Trump’s, point to the election this November as the determinant of the winner of the Oval Office for the next term, and not this trial and conviction of President Trump. All media sources say being a convicted felon does not disqualify President Trump from serving a second term as President. The election, therefore, is still on, just as before.

BidenImage
President Joe Biden

The main difference is with President Trump’s image and reputation, his name. There is simply no way around the fact that President Trump’s newfound status as a convicted felon will tarnish President Trump’s brand, and potentially, hurt his chances with undecided or with law-and-order voters.

That is on the one hand. On the other hand, perhaps Donald Trump’s supporters, his base, will be inspired by this trial and the unfortunate outcome for President Trump. If he inspires his base to work even harder to turn out loyal Republican voters, then this conviction could, in fact, help President Trump in this election. That is unlikely, but his base is inspired, and the future course of this campaign and election is unknown.

The difficulty for President Trump at this time is to campaign vigorously, once again, without angering the judge from this current trial, who has yet to sentence President Trump. Many pundits say that while a jail sentence is possible, up to four years, in fact, usually white collar criminals for this crime and lowest level of a felony do not, in fact, have to serve any jail time (ABC News Special Coverage, ABC World News Tonight, 5/30/2024; National Public Radio (NPR), “Live special coverage,” 5/30/2024). Trump may get off with a sentence of only probation, perhaps, and still, yet never have to see the inside of a jail cell for these crimes. That would certainly benefit President Trump, and leave him yet the time and freedom necessary to campaign for President this year. I think something along these lines would be best for our former President, and for our country. It is inconvenient for our country that President Trump’s personal legal problems hit us as a country in the middle of a presidential election. Our country, I think, would be better served with less chaos during this presidential election, not more chaos.

That said, I do not wish to make any excuses for former President Trump. Whenever someone is convicted of a crime for their behavior, I think it is not the time to blame “the system.” Rather, it is time for someone, anyone, if guilty of the behavior, which has been ruled criminal in a legitimate jury trial anywhere in the United States of America, at the point of conviction it is high time to begin to take responsibility for his or her actions, and not to blame everyone else. President Trump would do well to follow this advice, especially regarding his sentencing. Perhaps, President Trump should move on from playing the victim, and return to normal, negative campaigning about President Biden, once again. Remind the American people that they like President Trump better, that he is more of a regular guy than President Biden may appear to be.

Take all of this as free, non-partisan advice for President Trump. For me, this conviction is just one more reason for me, believe it or not, NOT to vote for President Trump. My mind was not changed by this trial. For purely political and philosophical reasons, I did not plan to vote for President Trump. I had already planned to vote for President Biden. Guess what. After this trial, conviction or not, I still plan to vote for President Biden. I am politically progressive. President Biden is closer to my politics. President Biden is doing a fine job up there in the White House, I believe, and there is no reason to change it up now.

Now that President Trump is a convicted felon, I feel no reason now to vote for him. In my mind, this unfortunate status, even if derived from a questionable criminal conviction, is another reason NOT to vote for him.

I do not suspect that, if handled well by the Trump campaign, I do not think this conviction will turn off many voters. In 2016, no one cared about candidate Trump’s various extravagances. He won that election in a fair campaign and vote. In 2020, by the way, I think President Biden won in a fair election, also. I hope that 2024 will be a free and fair election, as well. Whether this 2024 presidential election will in fact be a free and fair election, I think, remains to be seen. As a country, we are operating under our American system of jurisprudence. Local judges retain authority, in this way, over our national election. It remains to be seen whether, in the end, we can determine that this year’s election was, in fact, free and fair.

In any case, I suspect this criminal conviction may affect the voting decisions of a smaller portion of the electorate. There are polls. They vary. It is not worth delving through the poll numbers here. I think most people already know both presidential candidates, Biden and Trump. This conviction of Trump may make some difference to the electorate, namely, to independents and law-and-order voters, but I suspect, in balance, it will not make that much of a difference, overall.

I happen to support the voting rights of felons, by the way, even though President Trump is now an example of one. How odd it is that he will probably not be allowed to vote in this presidential election in the State of Florida, on this basis, but he can be elected, still, and serve in the highest office of this country, nonetheless.

I hope in all of his criminal convictions and charges, in New York and around this country, that President Trump does not have to go to jail. I do not plan to vote for President Trump, however, and I still hope that President Biden wins the election. RFK, Jr., becomes more of an alternative to both candidates, as well, out of this criminal conviction of President Trump.

RFKImage
Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

My main advice to President Trump is, at this time, before his sentencing for this New York felony conviction, my advice is, stay outta jail.

—Nicholas Patti

Raleigh, NC

USA

Source list:

This blog:  post, 4/1/2023.

News and Observer, Raleigh, NC, 5/31/2024, digital edition:

“Guilty,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “Ex-president, felon and candidate: 5 takeaways from Trump’s conviction,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “Trump conviction: What now?” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “Biden fundraises off Trump’s conviction,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “Trump verdict adds twist to 2024 race: A convicted felon,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “Trump’s other criminal cases: How they compare,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “Trump’s guilty verdict prompts sharp reactions from lawmakers,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; “What NC lawmakers say about Trump’s guilty verdict,” ExtraExtra section, digital edition; Headline, “Triangle Now” section, digital edition, 5/31/2024.

Wall Street Journal, editorial, New York, NY, 5/31/2024, print edition, p. A14.

CNN, 5/29/2024, 5/30/2024, 5/31/2024, throughout trial in 5/2024.

ABC News Special Coverage, ABC World News Tonight, 5/30/2024.

Fox News, during trial, 5/2024.

WRAL News, NBC affiliate, Raleigh, NC, 7 pm local news broadcast, 5/30/2024.

National Public Radio (NPR), “live special coverage,” 5/30/2024, heard over WUNC, 91.5, Chapel Hill, NC; NPR News, during trial, 5/2024.

Image credits:

Google search, 6/1/2024.

My Poetry Book

Read and enjoy these poems that range from suburban Charlotte, NC, to homelessness in New York City to a look-back at life under former President Trump’s administration, pre-pandemic, in the poem, “News Junkie.” I have since moved to the Raleigh, NC area. Note that my price per item includes taxes and shipping and handling for the order.

$15.00

President Joe Biden Deserves Credit on Economy, Middle East

by Nicholas Patti

January 31, 2024, Raleigh, NC—President Joe Biden is handling major domestic and foreign policy issues well. As such, he is doing well as President, and deserves re-election, at this time.

First up is probably the most important single domestic issue that could determine whether President Biden wins re-election this Fall. That issue is the economy. The economy is doing surprisingly well, at this time, and that fact benefits and reflects well on President Biden and the Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

First, GDP, or gross domestic product. The annual rate clocked in at a healthy 3.3% from October through December, 2023, according to a report from the US Commerce Department, as quoted in the Daily News (New York, NY: 1/26/2024, p. 18). Why? Apparently, despite high interest rates and prices, prices that “have frustrated many households,” still, consumer spending by Americans remained strong, according to Paul Wiseman, writing for the Associated Press in the Daily News (New York, NY: 1/26/2024, p. 18). Wiseman credits strong consumer spending by Americans in the fourth-quarter of 2023 with propelling that growth in the GDP in America, during that time period. The actual number of the expansion of consumer spending is 2.8%, during that fourth-quarter, according to the Daily News (New York, NY: 1/26/2024, p. 18).

The big issue facing the Federal Reserve now is what to do about the interest rates. The Fed may choose to keep interest rates high, at 5.4%, unchanged, or could choose to lower interest rates, which would significantly cut costs for Americans to access money, through loans for anything and everything. The Federal Reserve is meeting now, and finishes the meeting this Wednesday, when they are expected to make an announcement on this key topic, according to Christopher Rugaber, reporting from Washington for the Associated Press, as published in the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: 1/30/2024, p. 9A).

The pivotal factor for the interest rate level is, of course, inflation. News about inflation could not be better. Over the past six months, inflation has fallen to the Fed’s actual target level, 2% annually. That would suggest that the Fed may begin cutting the interest rate, increasing Americans’ access to money, through borrowing.

The politics of the data and the prospects cannot be missed. For his part, however, Fed Chair Jerome Powell denies any involvement. “We don’t think about politics. We think about what’s the right thing to do for the economy,” he is quoted as saying in News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: 1/30/2024, p. 9A).

I do think about politics, however, and it is one of the central themes of this blog post. I do not think that Powell’s and the Federal Reserve’s choices are politically motivated; I take him at his word. The facts showing how solid the economy and American consumer spending are right now, however, those facts can motivate Powell’s and the Federal Reserve’s choices regarding the interest rate level. These facts, and the resulting interest rates, do impact politics, centrally, in America, especially during this election year.

Currently, those facts look good for President Biden and his handling of the economy. The Daily News describes the political implications: “The state of the economy is sure to weigh on people’s minds ahead of the November elections. After an extended period of gloom, Americans are starting to feel somewhat better about inflation and the economy—a trend that could sustain consumer spending, fuel economic growth and potentially affect voters’ decisions” (New York, NY: 1/26/2024, p. 18).

I would argue that the state of the economy definitely affects voters’ decisions. Remember the campaign slogan that helped win former President Bill Clinton the White House in the 1990s: “It’s the economy, stupid.” That was his main campaign slogan, and that slogan worked. President Clinton won that election. Once again, I would echo that slogan for this presidential election: “It’s the economy, stupid.” Those economic facts currently benefit and reflect well on President Joe Biden. The Federal Reserve’s decisions on lowering interest rates this year will only prime the pump for President Biden.

I know that the economy is somewhat unpredictable. It remains a risk, therefore, for any president to tie his re-election chances to the economy, because it can change quickly. Paul Wiseman, writing in the Daily News (New York, NY: 1/26/2024, p. 18), made the point about how unpredictable the economy can be, and in fact has been, this past year. “The economy has repeatedly defied predictions that the Fed’s aggressive rate hikes would trigger a recession,” Wiseman writes. “Far from collapsing last year, the economy accelerated….”

All of this benefits President Joe Biden and his re-election campaign this year. President Biden deserves credit for this, and deserves re-election, in my opinion, but he would be wise to be somewhat careful about hanging all of his re-election chances on the currently strong economy. That could change, and quickly, but right now, it looks good.

Historically and currently, how the economy is doing at the time of the election, and how Americans feel about the economy, impacts the outcome of the election, centrally. President Biden would do well to continue to try to bring forth the message that the economy is doing well, and that President Biden is doing a good job managing the economy for the American people, at this time. If the economy continues to do well through the election this November, all of this will benefit President Biden’s re-election campaign and his chances of winning in November. If the economy were to take a turn for the worse and tank, however, that possibility would negatively impact President Biden’s re-election campaign, and would, conceivably, cost President Biden his re-election.

President Biden needs to be careful about how he takes credit for the current strength in the American economy under his current management. I think he should take credit, however, and bring out the message about the good economy, currently. I think President Biden and the Federal Reserve deserve credit for the strong American economy, currently, and I think President Joe Biden deserves re-election on the basis of this domestic issue, at this time.

Biden
President Joe Biden

On foreign policy, namely the Middle East, President Biden is handling the situation well, also, at this time, in my opinion. The latest news is that three American soldiers were killed in a drone attack in Jordan on Sunday, according to a statement by President Joe Biden this past Sunday. In addition, 25 American soldiers were injured in the same attack, according to the U.S. Central Command, as reported in the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: 1/29/2024, p. 8A; 1/30/2024, eEdition, p. 29).

President Biden vowed a response, but a measured response. Speaking on CNN (1/30/2024, television), President Biden said he had decided on a response, meaning a military response, but that he continued to try to avoid a wider war in the Middle East, namely, against Iran. Quoted in the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: 1/30/2024, p. 9A), President Biden said, “We will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner of our choosing.” President Biden named “radical Iran-backed militant groups operating in Syria and Iraq,” in the same article in the News and Observer.

From a North Carolina perspective, it is worth noting that all three U.S. Army soldiers killed were from Georgia, according to the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: eEdition, 1/30/2024, p. 31). There is this local, regional, Southern connection to this tragedy. The important point about these soldiers, who were killed, however, is not the U.S. state or region they were from, namely, Georgia and the South, but that they were American soldiers, United States service members. Three American soldiers were killed in this attack on U.S. forces in Jordan this past Sunday.

Another American footnote to this news story is that, simultaneous to the multiple attacks that have occurred in the Middle East since Israel invaded the Gaza Strip, in America, however, anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian bias complaints have increased substantially. During the final three months of 2023, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) reported a 178% increase of complaints of bias in the United States, totaling 3,578 complaints, as compared to the same period in 2022, according to the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: eEdition, 1/30/2024, p. 33). For all of this talk of war in the Middle East, against Iran and its proxies, between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, in Palestine, we should remember that hate and discrimination of any kind have no place in America. We should stand up against anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian bias and harassment in America, regardless of our opinion of the Israeli occupation and war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, in Palestine, and regardless of our outrage at our own, U.S. casualties and injuries in the U.S. Armed Forces, currently engaged in low-level armed conflict across the Middle East, but notably, not in Iran, itself.

I support President Joe Biden’s measured military response to attacks on U.S. service members in the Middle East. I agree with President Biden, as he said on CNN today, that we do not need a wider war in the Middle East, namely, against Iran, directly (1/30/2024). President Biden is determined to answer the attack on U.S. soldiers in the Middle East, namely, in this specific attack on the U.S. base and soldiers in Jordan, however. The three U.S. soldiers who were killed in last Sunday’s attack on U.S. forces in Jordan are the first U.S. soldiers to die, by the way, from any attacks since tensions in the Middle East have increased dramatically from the start of the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip, in Palestine, since October of last year (News and Observer: Raleigh, NC, 1/30/2024, p. 9A).

dreamstime_m_137555553
Jordan © Butenkow | Dreamstime.com

It should be noted that Iran itself distanced itself from the attacks in Jordan. “Resistance groups in the region do not take orders from the Islamic Republic of Iran,” the Foreign Ministry Spokesman for Iran, Nasser Kanaani, was quoted as saying this past Monday in the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: 1/30/2024, p. 9A). I think the best way to contain any possible regional, Middle Eastern conflagration from flaring up is not to attack Iran, directly. I would not support any attack on Iran, directly, as I think this would escalate the situation unnecessarily, and could lead to an increasing spiral of violence that could drag the U.S. into a wider war in the Middle East, namely, against Iran. America does not need a war with Iran, and the Iranian people, in particular, do not need a war against America.

Wars against America in the Middle East can be particularly deadly for the people of the Arab World. Remember the U.S. war in Iraq. Approximately 100,000 Iraqi civilians died at the hands of U.S. bombs, alone. The Iranian people do not need to experience something similar.

What is more, the United States does not need another long, unending, deadly war for the U.S. in the Middle East, either. Remember, also, the war in Iraq. The world protested for peace and against the war in Iraq on February 15, 2003. The U.S. commenced a ground invasion of Iraq, anyway, and the war in Iraq dragged on for literally, years to come. Thousands of U.S. troops lost their lives in that war, as well. The chant of the peace movement against the war in Iraq was, “Support the troops. Bring them home.” Eventually, we did, mostly.

Aside from the recent historical experience of the U.S. and Iraq, however, I would like to focus on the current challenges facing the U.S. in the Middle East, namely, Iran and its proxies.

It should be noted, also, that the reason the U.S. is currently having problems with Iranian proxy fighters in the Middle East is the war in the Gaza Strip, namely, the Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip, with the goal of eliminating Hamas. The U.S. stands by Israel. Iran, and in particular, its proxies across the Middle East, are on the other side, and passionately so. I agree with President Joe Biden’s handling of the war in Gaza, and President Biden’s defense of American forces across the Middle East, without bringing on another wider war for America, in particular, in the Middle East. President Biden, as the American President, is duty-bound to stand by American soldiers, placed in harm’s way in the Middle East. I think President Biden is doing a good job defending American soldiers deployed in the Middle East, while avoiding a broader, even more devastating, war.

There are hawks on this subject in America with whom I disagree. One such hawk would be Republican U.S. Senator Lindsay Graham, of neighboring South Carolina. Reportedly, he is urging President Biden to attack Iran, in Iran. “Hit Iran now,” he is quoted as saying in the News and Observer (Raleigh, NC: 1/30/2024, p. 9A). “Hit them hard.”

In light of comments such as these, President Biden may be seen as weak. I disagree. I think President Biden is doing a good job as our American president defending American soldiers overseas, precisely without embroiling the U.S. in another wider, unending, bloody, particularly American war in the Middle East. I agree with President Biden that it is in American interests to avoid such a war. Also, I support President Biden doing his job as our American president to defend our soldiers, militarily, who are currently deployed in the Middle East.

I think President Biden is handling the situation in the Middle East well, currently. I do not know what form the U.S. military response will take to the death of three U.S. service members in Jordan, last Sunday. I do know that President Biden has vowed a response. When asked about more details about such a strike, President Biden deferred, saying only that there would be a military response, and as for any details, he would only say, “We’ll see” (CNN, 1/30/2024).

President Joe Biden is handling the U.S. economy well, at this time, and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, as well. On two significant issues in this election year, one domestic, one foreign policy, President Biden is doing a good job.

President Biden deserves to win his re-election in the Presidential campaign this year.

—Nicholas Patti

Raleigh, NC

USA

President Biden, the Oncoming Mid-terms, and NOT the Ukraine

February 22, 2022—Afghanistan. The Ukraine. An economy that threatens to burn itself out with record high inflation. Democrats divided in Congress, unable to pass anything, despite holding the majority in both houses. A drubbing for the Democratic Party, nationally, in last year’s, off-year, 2021 elections. The precedent of history that shows that the party of the president usually loses seats in Congress in the first mid-term. And worst of all, a record low approval rating for President Joe Biden that rivals only that of former President Donald Trump, at this point in both men’s terms.

I think it is fair to say that at this point in his presidency, President Biden and the Democrats face significant headwinds going into this year’s mid-term elections. The control of both houses of Congress hangs in the balance in this year’s mid-term, national elections. The fact is that the election later this year will serve as a bellwether for two years of Democratic Party rule in Washington, as a referendum on Biden’s presidency, so far. The results will either surprise pollsters and political science prognosticators, and affirm President Biden’s rule, or they will serve as a death knell for continued Democratic rule in Washington, at least in Congress, at this time. The simple fact is that the oncoming mid-terms are approaching American politics like a semi-truck fresh off a Canadian protest against liberal pandemic policies, back on the highway, and roaring ahead at 75 mph in a free-market, laissez-faire, 70 mph speed limit zone. In this metaphor, the trucker is not going to receive a ticket for speeding down the road, nor for protesting liberal policies on the pandemic in Canada and America; instead, in this scenario, this protesting trucker, roaring ahead in his semi-, this trucker owns the road.

The Republican Party is on the march. Watch any episode of the 6 o’clock news on Fox News on cable TV, and you can see lots and lots of hungry Republicans, foaming at the mouth, anticipating their next big meal, in which they devour fresh red meat and re-take control of Congress later this year in the mid-terms. In this political context, at this time, whatever is a Democrat to do?

As a registered Democrat and a proud, public, democratic socialist myself, I respectfully disagree. I think that despite the headwinds, President Biden is doing basically a good job. The challenge for the Democratic Party and Democratic Party leadership, to me, is putting out the right message, the right spin, and showing how President Biden is doing a good job at this time, and why the Democratic Party deserves, currently, another two years in control of Congress. The time now is not to show what they would do, but what they have done, so far, in the past two years. The time now is to show how President Joe Biden has been doing a good job as our US president, and how President Biden and the Democrats still represent the best interests of working Americans and—dare I say it—the middle class. I think if the Democrats can put out this message, and be convincing about it, then they still have a chance in hell of holding on to the reins of power in Congress. True to the principles of our democracy in America, the voters will have the final say, come this November in our national election.

The question for me, on this blog, is why? Why do I think that President Joe Biden is doing a good job, and why do I think he still represents the interests of the working and middle class in America? I am concerned, also, with the interests of the working class, internationally, but as we are discussing specifically the American president, I will limit my focus to the American working and “middle class.” Furthermore, I will remain interested only in the top-of-the-news items, and not give too much credit to President Biden for changing the rules for organizing labor unions, which he has done, in favor of labor unions. President Biden deserves credit for this change, in federal regulations, but I will not delve into that here. I will remain on the top-of-the-news issues, and I will respond to the issues we see in the mainstream daily newspapers and on the broadcast and cable television news. Even with these limits, I think President Biden is doing a good job. That is the job of the Democratic Party to do, to win this mid-term election. They must tout the success of this Administration, or they will be lost. I think there is substance there to say that, on this basis, we can judge that President Biden is doing a good job, and his Party, the Democrats, do still deserve to remain in control in Congress, and thus in Washington, in general.

What do I base this pro-Democrat, pro-Biden viewpoint on? First of all, let us examine foreign policy. I will studiously, consciously ignore the current hot topic, the Ukraine, for reasons I shall state below. Suffice it to say that I believe in diplomacy only for the US in the Ukraine, and I agree with President Biden’s closing statement, in his speech today to the nation, that there is still a chance for diplomacy. I am against any war between the United States and Russia over the Ukraine. I do consider the situation in the Ukraine to be regrettable, however, since I do support, in principle, the self-determination of peoples. This support I give applies to the people of Russia, it should be stated, and for the people of the Ukraine.

dreamstime_m_147277711
Kiev, Ukraine, City View with St. Sophia’s Golden Dome Cathedral

Let us examine President Biden’s record on foreign policy more closely. Afghanistan comes to mind, namely, President Biden’s withdrawal of US forces from that country last summer. In this case, the right-wing of this country currently controls this narrative. Although Americans had lost all appetite for yet another endless, 25-year war, dragging on, interminably, seemingly forever, with no end in sight, Americans had even less patience, it turns out, for a messy withdrawal. President Biden did the best withdrawal humanly possible, pulling out tens-of-thousands of aggrieved, at-risk Afghans, but, rather predictably, once American troops were gone, the so-called enemy, the Taliban, quickly re-took the government. The war lasted, not quite 25 years, but around 20. What did America gain after 20 years of war in Afghanistan? Not much, as it turned out. As I just said, the Taliban quickly re-took power. These are the same people who had been in charge in 2001, when Al-Qaeda perpetrated 9-11 on our country, the United States, largely from Afghanistan. How can that possibly be seen as a foreign policy victory for President Biden and the United States?

Let me remind you, I am a democratic socialist. In all of this talk of Vladimir Putin’s supposed aggression in the Ukraine, what is totally lost, and totally absent, from all of this discussion is even the mention of that old, socialist concept of American aggression. We used to call it American imperialism. If it has not already been done, let me hereby name the US war in Afghanistan, after 20-some-odd years, with no end in sight, not unlike Vietnam, which did in fact last 25 years, let me name that ongoing war in Afghanistan as one that evolved into one of American imperialism. Simply put, after 20-some-odd years, the Americans really had no right to meddle in someone else’s country, halfway around the world, in this case, Afghanistan. Even if you believe that it started out with a noble cause for the United States, after 9-11, after all, still, after 20 years, I think it was high time for the US to get out. To withdraw. We no longer had any business there. They heard us, already. Let them practice their own self-determination of peoples, and if they choose the Taliban, then let them have it. If we get attacked again, and they do understand this, by now, then we can go back in, if and only if we actually need to. Otherwise, it had already become long overdue that the US get out. Let them have their own country again, already. I have stated this once, already, however. It is my opinion, however. The United States desperately and sorely needed to end that war, and to end our involvement and control over their country, Afghanistan, and that is exactly what we did. That is exactly what President Biden accomplished with our withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Far from the criticism President Biden still receives from the hawks and much of the mainstream media on Afghanistan, I think he did the right thing. Whatever your opinion of the beginning of the war and the underlying reasons the US had for originally going in to Afghanistan, it was long time for the US to exit their country, and to relinquish control back to their military, and/or militaries, and ultimately, back to the Afghan people. Now, the US is free of another 25-year, endless war, not unlike Vietnam, in which American lives and the American treasury and, worst-of-all, American blood is wasted on an ignoble effort to control the destiny of a different people half-way across the world. Thank God it is finally over. President Biden did us all a great favor by freeing us of this endless war, this endless morass. Any hint of American imperialism taking over in their country was crushed by our American withdrawal.

President Biden does not deserve blame for our American withdrawal from Afghanistan. Rather, despite the Taliban retaking their government, President Biden deserves credit for extricating America, and for preventing the lives of ever-more young, American men, American soldiers in our military, from being sacrificed on the altar of remote control, from Washington, DC, over the destiny of the country in the mountains of Afghanistan. Kudos to Joe Biden. He has saved countless American lives already from war in that country, since our withdrawal, and our country cannot be accused now of pursuing classical American imperialism in their country. There is no more claim of “big stick diplomacy” from the US in Afghanistan—we are out-of-there. Finally. If anyone in the US wanted to be heard in Afghanistan after 9-11, trust me, they heard us. Now, they can have their country back, again.

For the record, however, let it be known that I opposed the war in Afghanistan from the start. I thought we should be talking, not bombing and invading. I was a part of the peace movement here in America, at the time. I protested the war in Iraq on February 15, 2003, the day of global protest against the war in Iraq, and I opposed, also, the war in Afghanistan. Suffice it to say, 20 years later, I still opposed the war in Afghanistan. I feel, as I stated above, that 20-years-on, there was even more reason to oppose the war in Afghanistan than when we first went in.

I applaud President Biden for our withdrawal in Afghanistan. I consider it a foreign policy victory for the United States, even if not a military one in the country of Afghanistan. I think that distinction is a very important one, too. We should not allow the right-wing of this country, America, to control our perspective on this, and our mainstream narrative about it. We should be touting the end of the war in Afghanistan as a victory for the US, not an ignoble defeat. We have no business determining their government for them. They heard us already. Move on. Once again, kudos to President Biden for this.

On to the next foreign policy hot topic: the Ukraine. Here, I support President Biden’s approach so far, also. I am studiously, consciously ignoring this issue. President Biden is moving US troops around in Eastern Europe, but he has not given up on diplomacy, believe it or not, in the face of potential Russian aggression in the Ukraine. Here, President Vladimir Putin of Russia is the imperialist, not the United States. In any case, I agree with diplomacy only in the Ukraine for the US. This country really is on the doorstep, in the “backyard,” so to speak, of Russia. The United States really has no business at war in this country against Russia. In terms of the Cold War, it would have been unthinkable. It would be akin to the Soviet Union placing nuclear missiles in Cuba, in the United States’ “backyard.” I am thankful that the Soviets withdrew their nuclear weapons from approaching Cuba in the Cuban missile crisis during the Cold War last century, thus avoiding nuclear Armageddon and the destruction of the entire planet, within minutes of the ship approaching the island of Cuba. Similarly, the US really has no right to fight a war in the Ukraine at all, which is, after all, itself a former Soviet republic. That said, I do support the right of self-determination for the Ukrainian people, and I condemn any Russian imperialist aggression in that country.

That said, not unlike former President Donald Trump, I feel no ill will toward Russia, itself, nor toward their President, Vladimir Putin. I noted that Putin named Vladimir Lenin and Stalin as heroes of his, as a Russian leader, not as a Communist. I should note that, as a socialist, myself, for all of his faults, and there are many, Stalin is credited by some as being critical in ending World War II and defeating Hitler. I know that is a terrible sentence. I do feel awkward about crediting Stalin with anything, but I acknowledge the critical role he played in defeating fascism in Europe and the world during World War II, in particular. Remember, it was not until after World War II ended, with a mutual, shared victory for the United States and the Soviet Union, who fought on the same side, against Hitler and the fascists; it was not until after the end of World War II that the Cold War began. Before the beginning of the Cold War, there was the united front, globally, against fascism and the Nazis. We were on the same side, then. And in the Soviet Union, may I remind you, that meant Stalin. Later, he became the evil villain incarnate to the Western world. First, it must be remembered, he was an Eastern hero, fighting against Hitler. To be honest and accurate, however, I must acknowledge that Hitler betrayed Stalin, and early on in the War, they were not enemies, unlike the United States. The Soviets and Germany fought one hell of war in World War II in the Russian winter in Russia, however, we cannot forget. Remember, also, the US and the Soviet Union won that war, together. Germany had too many fronts, all-at-once, and Germany lost the War on all fronts, and in Germany, itself.

Souvenir T-shirts with Putin and Trump and the Text ‘We Love Russia’

Then, there is Vladimir Lenin, of namesake, Vladimir Putin. President Putin named Lenin as a hero of his, also, specifically. As a democratic socialist, myself, I claim Lenin to be a hero of mine, also, albeit for different reasons. May I remind President Putin, respectfully, that Lenin’s slogan about imperial Russian wars to the West, namely World War I, was, and I quote, “Peace, land, bread.” That is the slogan that Vladimir Lenin led the Russian army back from the front with Germany in World War I, and he single-handedly, with the Russian army, took out the Russian czar, who at the time was really into waging a Russian war of aggression to the West of Russia. Lenin has been criticized, in fact, for giving away so much land to the Germans, in World War I. The fact that Germany then lost World War I, and the Russian imperialist aggressor, namely, the czar, also lost, should not be forgotten. Who won? Why, Lenin did. Vladimir Lenin came out on top of that one, we should note. President Putin does not need a lecture from me on Russian history and the legacy of Vladimir Lenin, but let me just say, President Putin is not currently pursuing “Peace, Land, Bread” at this time in the Ukraine. Hopefully, the US will heed that call, at least for the “Peace” part of Lenin’s message. Perhaps, President Putin will change his mind and follow Lenin’s lead on that score, also, and not the example of Russian imperialism, in which tradition President Putin seemed to place Lenin.

Likeminded scholars may agree to disagree about the legacy and rightful place in history of Vladimir Lenin. The simple fact is, however, that while I am against Russian aggression in the Ukraine, I feel no ill will toward President Vladimir Putin, who does at least cite Vladimir Lenin as one of his heroes, as well. Putin said this in his address to the Russian people and the world on Monday, February 21. Both President Putin and I cite Vladimir Lenin as one of our heroes, albeit for different reasons. It should come as no surprise, then, that I harbor no ill will toward the Russian president, nor against the Russian people. Also, I should note, unlike President Putin, I harbor no ill will against the Ukrainian people, nor the Ukrainian leadership in the Ukrainian government, either.

I am against any US involvement in a war against Russia in the Ukraine, I should repeat. I hold this position for the reasons stated above. That said, I think President Biden is doing a good job of trying to support the Ukrainian people, short of US military involvement in the country, and also, for not giving up on diplomacy, ultimately, even at this late date in the unfolding events there.

Having said all of this, let me now studiously avoid the topic of the Ukraine. I will now commence to ignore the issue, as I said I would, earlier in this article.

Now, to domestic policy. For the United States, for President Biden, domestically, for the Democrats in this year’s mid-terms, specifically, how is President Biden doing, domestically speaking, here, at home, in the United States?

Again, the question for me, as it should be for the Democratic Party leadership, at this time, is not, what can we do, but rather, what have we done? The answer is not the greatest, but it is good, if you ask me.

Inflation, you say, as do the expert witnesses on Fox News on cable television. Inflation is at record-high levels. How can anyone say that is a success? Inflation is not a success, but the economic recovery from the recession in the United States during the pandemic is a victory. The creation of jobs and very low unemployment is an economic victory. What can I say? Address the inflation bug, and keep the economy humming, as it is now. Keep the jobs available in the current economy. Our problem in America now is that so many people have a little more money, what with last year’s stimulus and with jobs now available again, our problem is that so many people have a little more money on hand, that now prices for goods that people are buying again are going up. Surprise surprise. Address inflation, and keep the economic recovery going. I fail to see a giant policy failure here. Instead, I see success breeding the problems of success.

Again, I do not think President Biden deserves blame. I think he deserves credit, for restarting our economy. The big down-side risk, however, is that the economy is unpredictable. Just as soon as people can be working again, and spending money to buy stuff, just as quickly the economy can go South (no offense intended), and people can be out-of-work, once again. Also, inflation really is a problem; there is no mistaking that, not even from me, here. President Biden’s challenge is to manage the economy, address inflation, and not ruin the so-far short-lived economic recovery. The challenge for Democratic leadership, by the way, is to change the narrative on this. Once again, our right-wing, voiced on Fox News, but not exclusively on Fox News, seems to be controlling the narrative. Democrats have to give credit where credit is due, while still acknowledging the pitfalls of inflation. Instead of blaming President Biden for our economy, currently, we should praise him. We should address, however, the result of success, which is the problem of inflation, along with the achievement of job creation.

Next, domestically speaking, is legislation. How has President Biden done on his legislative agenda? Again, we hear he has been blocked. I would argue, no, far from the truth. If the economy is humming again, I would argue, then the desired result of the stimulus plan of early 2021, and the passage and enactment of the Infrastructure Bill later in that same year, then the desired result of both of these legislative initiatives has been realized. The economy is humming again, no? There are jobs again, no? That spells economic recovery, not recession. Perhaps, we do not need another stimulus, which the moderate Democrats blocked in the Democratic Congress. So President Biden and the Democratic leadership did not get all that they had hoped for out of the Democratic Congress. So what? They achieved their larger goal of stimulating the economy and getting money moving again among now working Americans and the middle class, once again. Perhaps, the Democrats achieved their goals without a few more trillion dollars of federal spending. Perhaps, the Democratic moderates can unite with progressives and the President in claiming victory, once again, not defeat. It is, after all, still about the economy, stupid, as former President Bill Clinton said, back in the 1990s. Not much has changed. I would argue, in fact, that if the US were not shedding jobs like nobody’s business in 2020, then President Donald Trump would have been re-elected. The pandemic and the recession therein handed President Biden the office, and the victory in the election. Now, the economy is doing great again. Great! Let the Democrats cash in, politically, so to speak, and not fall to a conservative narrative that says the Democrats are all a bunch of squabbling failures, led by the biggest failure-in-chief, President Joe Biden. That is not true. The Democrats have restarted the economy. Let the Democrats now deal with the fallout of renewed growth, inflation, and not worry about failing to spend multiple trillions of dollars of additional federal spending and stimulation, trillions of dollars that the moderate wing felt was unnecessary to spend, and to go deeper into debt to do so.

I would have supported the Social Spending Bill. I did take a position last December, on this blog, supporting it. The moderates within the Democratic Party blocked it. So what? It is still about the economy, stupid, and Democrats would do well to remember that. Particularly, Democrats would do well to remember that message. Simply manage inflation, and you’ve got economic success. Claim the victory; do not admit defeat.

Again, the risk here is that the economy will falter. It is unpredictable, after all, and not within government control. This is capitalism, may I remind you, not socialism. Inflation can be managed. A suddenly disastrous economy, however, would definitely cost the Democrats the Congress. The Democrats should tout their success with bringing the economy out of the recent recession, but they should be wary that the economy can betray them by the mid-term election this November. In any case, the Democrats need to re-take control of the narrative on this issue, once again. At this time, this issue should be seen as a victory, not a defeat, for President Biden. Just do not rest all of your laurels on this one, as it can easily reverse itself.

That is all I have to say in this blog post. I think President Biden is doing a good job, both on foreign policy, and domestically, at this time. We do not need a US war in the Ukraine, but President Biden already understands this. President Putin should heed the lesson in history of Vladimir Lenin, but I trust President Putin knows this already. President Putin gave the lecture on international television about his Russian hero, Vladimir Lenin, after all. He does not need me to tell him. All I can say, however, on this score, is “Peace, Land, Bread.”

And re-elect Democrats in this year’s mid-term election here in America. We can build toward a socialist future, but we must do so by achieving international peace, not war.

Here is a slogan I will close with from the American socialist and communist traditions: “Socialism, in our lifetimes.” It did not happen in the 20th century in America, but perhaps, with peace, internationally, it can still be found in our near future. Democracy, after all, still lives, here in America. We shall see what the results will be this November, and before then, we shall see what campaigns, and what messaging, both major parties in America put out there. The voters will decide.

On to the mid-terms for the Democrats and progressives in America! And, as ever, and always, viva la France! Viva!

—Nicholas Patti

Raleigh, NC

USA

photo credits:

Putin and Trump:

Kiev, Ukraine:

President Joe Biden, Diplomacy, and the Working Class

New York, June 20, 2021–One thing nice about being homeless in New York City is that you can enjoy free speech.(I am not so sure about freedom of the press, however.) When one is homeless in New York, one can freely express one’s opinion about, say, the U.S. president, and still remain under the radar. I know a blog on social media is different, as I suggested a moment ago. Although I am currently homeless in New York, I will comment on the current U.S. president on my blog, as I had hoped to after he was first elected, and I wrote a blog post on the outgoing president, President Donald Trump, instead.

I was thrilled when current President Joe Biden was elected and began his term. I wanted to celebrate his victory with a blog post, but I ended up writing about the then-still-current president, President Donald Trump, instead. I would like to celebrate President Joe Biden’s victory now. Congratulations and Godspeed, I say to President Joe Biden now.

Part of the reason I voted for then-candidate Joe Biden was that I believed he would still do the job as a U.S. president, despite the fact that he was being demonized by President Trump and the right wing as politically far-left. I did not believe President Trump when he erroneously claimed that our country and the world would fall apart if Joe Biden were elected. What’s more, Joe Biden held his own against Donald Trump in the debates. As a plausibly working-class guy, candidate Joe Biden won my confidence.

President Joe Biden has borne that out, and shown his promise is true. The only problem is that, as usual with U.S. presidents, including former President Donald Trump, President Joe Biden is doing too good a job as the U.S. president. Donald Trump did not do too good a job, but he did the job. President Joe Biden is doing the job, also, but I think he is doing too good a job, currently.

First, I do not remember what Joe Biden has done so far, up to this point, for the working class and the labor movement in America. I remember now. Joe Biden paid the American people with the stimulus checks, and he is trying now to stimulate the economy, albeit without the stimulus payments to the American people. I remember, also, that President Biden attempted to raise the federal minimum wage, but was blocked by the Republicans in the U.S. Senate. The federal minimum wage has not changed, therefor, at this time.

As for doing the job as U.S. president, Joe Biden has really done a bang-up job. It’s scary how well he is doing, in this regard. Micheal D. Shear said it in his article in the *New York Times* (6/18/21, p. A8). Commenting on President Biden’s poise upon leaving Europe, Shear wrote that “he left Switzerland to conclude his eight-day, three-country diplomatic tour of Europe.” That is true. President Biden shored up the G-7 in England, then NATO from Brussels, Belgium, and he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Geneva. He also met with the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan along the way, and the European Union (EU) (*New York Times,* 6/18/21; *Daily News,* New York, 6/16/21, p. 10, 6/15/21, p. 18.) President Biden accomplished an entire year’s worth of diplomacy, in Europe, and he did it in just over one week.

What is truly frightening about all of this is not even the staggering pace and volume of the diplomacy, but the content. With the G-7 and NATO et al, President Joe Biden shored up global capitalism and the world economy, and re-established America’s place in the world, diplomatically and economically. That is, capitalism globally is still sound, and Europe and the U.S. are on top, to spell it out. By the time today’s paper hit the newsstands, what’s more, President Biden had already earned the ire of the East on the planet, including China and North Korea (*New York Post,* 6/19/21, pp. 9, 24). Russia had already expressed its disdain. I should note that this bad start with the East can change.

The troubling thing for me is that the working class of the world, including in the United States, was just held down under global capitalism. Unfortunately, that is part of the job of the U.S. President, in my humble opinion. Think NAFTA redux. This is the G-7, baby, and if anyone out there has any questions, that is the NATO summit. I just hope President Biden had fun, that is all.

I still think President Joe Biden’s heart is in the right place regarding the working class. (So was President Bill Clinton’s). I think he still wants to help the working class, but he, sadly, lacks the occasion to do so. President Joe Biden may be doing fine as the U.S. president, but he needs to demonstrate to the American people, and to American organized labor and the American worker, in particular, that he works in their interest and on their side, in point of fact and in this real world. President Joe Biden needs to make the occasion and prove some working-class credentials, at this time.

Otherwise, he’s doing just fine. Very fine.

—Nicholas Patti

New York, NY

USA